The REAL CONSERVATIVE BILL OR RIGHTS !!! #CCOT #WAKEUPAMERICA

> > 'We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights.'
> >
> > ARTICLE I:
> > You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth.. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.
> >
> > ARTICLE II:
> > You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc.; but the world is full of dummies, and probably always will be.
> >
> > ARTICLE III:
> > You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
> >
> > ARTICLE IV:
> > You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
> >
> > ARTICLE V:
> > You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.
> >
> > ARTICLE VI:
> > You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you get the blue juice.
> >
> > ARTICLE VII:
> > You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure..
> >
> > ARTICLE VIII:
> > You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful.
> >
> > ARTICLE IX:
> > You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
> >
> > ARTICLE X:
> > This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you came from, English is our language. Learn it!
> >
> > Lastly
> >
> > ARTICLE XI:
> > You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, sorry if you are uncomfortable with it. 

Homeland Security Secretary Utterly Ignorant of Fourth Amendment !!!

If we needed proof that some people in the federal government don't understand (nevermind follow)he Constitution, wepresent the exampl(link is external)e of Jeh Johnson, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security:

Johnson, a man with sweeping power to invade the property rights and privacy of every American using judge-less warrants to search and seize records, has a Fourth Amendment problem: He doesn’t really know it.

As reported at Mediaite(link is external), Senator Rand Paul grilled Secretary Johnson at a hearing about government’s obtaining records from telephone companies without a warrant, which seems on its face to violate the Fourth Amendment:

“Right off the bat, Paul, a 2016 presidential candidate, asked Johnson if he believes the Fourth Amendment ‘applies to third party records,’ specifically those of telephone companies. Johnson said that question is ‘beyond my competence as secretary of homeland security’ to answer intelligently.”

Wow. As Mark Fitzgibbons notes, "Apparently, ignorance of the law is an excuse if you run a massive federal bureaucracy with sweeping police state powers."

http://goo.gl/GbPc7P

Please RT - THANKS!

NEUTERING THE #CONSTITUTION ! @Views

By Donna Wasson

April 18, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

"The Matrix is everywhere, it's all around us, here even in this room. You can see it out your window, or on your television. You feel it when you go to work, or go to church or pay your taxes. It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth. That you are a slave, Neo. That you, like everyone else, was born into bondage…kept inside a prison that you cannot smell, taste, or touchh. A prison for your mind."

"This is your last chance. After this, there is no going back. You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and you believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill and stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes."

OK folks, put the blue pill down and take the red one. It's time you woke up to reality. The America we live in is under tyranny. We are monitored and controlled at nearly every turn and the chains are getting tighter every day.

http://goo.gl/nOI5rG

Please RT - THANKS!

Comments?

BAD NEWS FOR #OBAMA AMNESTY AT APPEALS COURT ! @Breitbart

AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster

by BREITBART NEWS17 Apr 2015

From Politico:

There were few positive signs for the White House Friday as President Barack Obama’s latest executive actions on immigration were debated in front of a federal appeals court.

During more than two hours of oral arguments before the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Obama’s own statements about his immigration moves were used by a Republican-appointed judge to put a Justice Department lawyer on the defensive.

And the sole Democratic appointee on the three-judge panel repeatedly argued for the legality of the president’s actions by turning to an argument that the administration fears could discourage illegal immigrants from applying for programs that offer them quasi-legal status and work permits.

By the time the court session wrapped up, it appeared likely the appeals judges will rule, 2-1, against the administration’s request for a stay of a district court injunction barring Obama from going forward with an expansion of a program offering quasi-legal status to illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children and with a new program offering the same benefits to illegal immigrant parents of U.S. citizens.

Read the rest of the story here.

Read More Stories About:

JUDGE OPENS DOOR FOR #COPS TO STORM YOUR HOME ! @WND

Rules 3rd Amendment doesn't apply to law enforcement

Published: 6 hours ago

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/07/cchumley_avatar.jpg

 CHERYL CHUMLEY

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/04/SWAT.png

SWAT members approach a home during the search for suspects of the Boston Marathon bombings.

The Third Amendment, which guards against the quartering of soldiers in citizens’ homes – and which came into being because of the abuse of British troops against American patriots – has just been dinged by a judge who ruled the provision doesn’t apply to police.

In essence, that means police on official business could claim the legal right to bust into a private citizen’s home and occupy it.

The determination from federal district court Judge Andrew Gordon was rendered when he dismissed a Third Amendment claim from a Henderson, Nevada, family who suffered that very fate.

“Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare Is Becoming Our Reality” chronicles how America has arrived at the point of being a de facto police state, and what led to an out-of-control government that increasingly ignores the Constitution. Order today!

Anthony Mitchell and his parents Michael and Linda Mitchell sued the City of Henderson and several police agents in federal court for a July 2011 incident they described in court papers.

Volokh reported: “On the morning of July 10, 2011, officers from the Henderson Police Department responded to a domestic violence call at a neighbor’s residence. … [Police] told [Mitchell] police needed to occupy his home in order to gain a ‘tactical advantage’ against the occupant of the neighboring house. Anthony Mitchell told the officer that he did not want to become involved and that he did not want police to enter his residence.”

Police went to the Mitchell family house anyway, and “banged forcefully on the door and loudly commanded Anthony Mitchell to open the door to his residence,” his complaint read.

Mitchell then reportedly contacted his mother to let her know what was going on – and police “smashed open” his door with a metal ram, court documents indicated.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/cops-can-storm-homes-court-suggests/#QvhQ8yzilAAxuqHX.99

#American Federalism: Source, Purpose and Establishment @NUZZLE

april 16, 2013 by david j. shestokas

filed under: constitution educational series tagged with: bill of rights, constitution,federalism, founding fathers, independence, natural law, separation of power,sovereignty

“The federal and State governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers, and designed for different purposes.”

James Madison   The Federalist, No.46

The American freedoms of religion, speech, press and assembly as protected and practiced were new to the world. Those contributions to the world’s political thought were uniquely American. So it is with the concept of federalism. The establishment of multiple layers of government with divided sovereignty over the same territory each responsible for different aspects of life was a unique American development as well.

Dictionary Definitions of Federalism Do Not Reflect American Federalism

According to Merriam-Webster: Federalism is the distribution of power in an organization (as a government) between a central authority and the constituent units. The Free Dictionary defines the term as: A system of government in which power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units.

The dictionaries speak of divided authority, but fail the mention the key to American Federalism. The American Constitution, uniquely in history divided “sovereignty”.¹ By consent of the people “sovereignty” over subject matter was divided among governmental units.

The Declaration of Independence outlined the Natural Law basis for the legal establishment of the United States. Natural Law begins with a sovereign individual that for his own benefit grants certain aspects of his sovereignty to society.

http://goo.gl/l3tHDs

Please RT - THANKS!

Comments?

#Obama ‘reckless disregard’ of the #law ! @HumanEvents

Michael Barone | Friday Feb 20, 2015 6:00 AM

1stt Amendment to the #Constitution: #Freedom of Religion

january 18, 2013 by david j. shestokas

filed under: constitution educational series tagged with: amendment, bill of rights, congress, constitution, first amendment, founding fathers, religion, speech

The first ten amendments to the US Constitution are referred to as the Bill of Rights.  The First Amendment protects “freedom of expression” for Americans by restricting government authority to pass laws interfering with the freedoms of religion, speech, press and assembly.  A fifth right, to petition the government for redress of grievances, is listed, but the citizenshave allowed it to be taken from them.  The first freedom protected in the First Amendment is religion.

It is fitting that protection of religious liberty from government interference is America’s “first freedom”. Many of the first North American colonists were motivated by a search for religious liberty.

Duty of 17^th Century Civil Authorities to Save Souls

Seventeenth century European religious persecution arose from the belief, held by Protestants and Catholics, that a society must have religious uniformity since there was only a single true religion.  Civil authorities had a duty to impose the single true religion by force if necessary in the interest of saving the souls of all citizens.  Heretics might be executed and nonconformists were granted no mercy.

- See more at: http://www.shestokas.com/constitution-educational-series/first-amendment-to-the-constitution-freedom-of-religion/#sthash.gO3E3MX5.dpuf

Natural #Law and the Legitimate Authority of the #UnitedStates

March 15, 2013 by david j. shestokas

filed under: constitution and its people, constitution educational series, guest commentary & reflections, uncategorized tagged with: aquinas, bill of rights, constitution, declaration of independence, founding fathers, john locke, natural law, obama, supreme court, thomas jefferson

Government needs a basis to exercise authority over people. Citizens must accept government authority.  A government lacking acceptance of the people over whom it exercises authority will not endure.  Such acceptance comes from fear, tradition or philosophy.

Dictators obtain authority by instilling fear of disobedience in the populace. A theocracy ordained by God arises from religious traditions.  A monarchy combines religious traditions[1] and fear of the monarch’s absolute authority. Communists have gained power with a philosophy based upon the “dictatorship of the proletariat”.[2]  The United States was founded upon a philosophy of Natural Law as the source of legitimate legal authority for government.

Government by Philosophy:  Understanding, Acceptance & Consistent Conduct

For a government founded on philosophy to maintain its authority, three things are needed:

1. An understanding by the people of the philosophy
2. An acceptance by the people of the philosophy
3. Conduct by the government consistent with the philosophy

Declaration of Independence Established Natural Law the Organizing Principle of the United States

- See more at: http://www.shestokas.com/uncategorized/natural-law-and-the-legitimate-authority-of-the-united-states/#sthash.asvdTd2Q.dpuf

Law Firm Facebook Pages Are Lame

by Sam Glover on February 4th, 2012

Somewhere out there a social media consultant must be blogging about how important it is to have a Facebook page for your law firm, because “Follow my firm’s Facebook page!” updates seem to pop up in my feed every day or two. That consultant is a moron.

I’m sure there are law firms out there somewhere that are earning all kinds of media or pulling in tons of potential clients from its Facebook page, but that doesn’t mean everyone should do it.

http://goo.gl/cAFopp

TweetMe Please

Justice Stevens: The five extra words that can fix the Second Amendment

Scott Olson/Getty - A customer shops for a pistol at Freddie Bear Sports sporting goods in Tinley Park, Ill.

• 5000+
• Share to Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on LinkedIn
• Add to PersonalPost
• Share via Email
• Print Article
• More

By John Paul Stevens, Published: April 11 E-mail the writer

John Paul Stevens served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court from 1975 to 2010. This essay is excerpted from his new book, “Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution.”

Following the massacre of grammar-school children in Newtown, Conn., in December 2012, high-powered weapons have been used to kill innocent victims in more senseless public incidents. Those killings, however, are only a fragment of the total harm caused by the misuse of firearms. Each year, more than 30,000 people die in the United States in firearm-related incidents. Many of those deaths involve handguns.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-five-extra-words-that-can-fix-the-second-amendment/2014/04/11/f8a19578-b8fa-11e3-96ae-f2c36d2b1245_story.html

PROGRESSIVES ARE WRONG ABOUT THE ESSENCE OF THE CONSTITUTION

By: George Will
4/17/2014 09:27 AM

RESIZE:AAA

PRINT

20

In a 2006 interview, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer said the Constitution is “basically about” one word — “democracy” — that appears in neither that document nor the Declaration of Independence. Democracy is America’s way of allocating political power. The Constitution, however, was adopted to confine that power in order to “secure the blessings of” that which simultaneously justifies and limits democratic government — natural liberty.

The fundamental division in U.S. politics is between those who take their bearings from the individual’s right to a capacious, indeed indefinite, realm of freedom, and those whose fundamental value is the right of the majority to have its way in making rules about which specified liberties shall be respected.

http://www.humanevents.com/2014/04/17/progressives-are-wrong-about-the-essence-of-the-constitution/