Vote Trump 2016 !

Vote Trump 2016 !
Trump 2016
Showing posts with label #guns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #guns. Show all posts

Friday, December 18, 2015

#BlackLiesMattter - 3 dead, 7 wounded in Thursday shootings across #Chicago @FOX


photo


CHICAGO (STMW) - Three people were killed and at least seven others wounded in shootings across Chicago on Thursday.
The latest homicide happened at 5:22 p.m. in the South Side Auburn Gresham neighborhood.
Officers responded to a call of shots fired and found 21-year-old Willie Clifton with gunshot wounds in the 7700 block of South Winchester Avenue, according to Chicago Police and the Cook County medical examiner’s office.
Clifton, who lived in the 7900 block of South Wood Street, was dead at the scene.
A 21-year-old man was fatally shot an hour earlier in the same South Side neighborhood.
At 4:30 p.m., Christopher Keys was found in a vehicle with multiple gunshot wounds in the 8300 block of South Ada, authorities said.
Keys, who lived in the 11000 block of South Artesian, was taken to Advocate Christ Medical Center in Oak Lawn, where he later died.
Thursday morning, a tow truck driver was shot and killed in the South Side Park Manor neighborhood.
Lutredze Evans, 32, was driving a flatbed tow truck northbound in the 6800 block of South Anthony about 9 a.m. when someone opened fire at him, authorities said.
He was shot multiple times in the chest and arms, but continued driving northbound until he crashed the truck into a viaduct at 68th and King, police said.
Evans, of the 8300 block of South Rhodes, was taken to Stroger Hospital, where he was pronounced dead at 9:43 a.m., authorities said.
The latest nonfatal shooting happened about 11:15 p.m. in the Calumet Heights neighborhood on the South Side.
A 47-year-old man and another man of an unknown age were shot inside of a bar in the 9300 block of Commercial Avenue after a male walked in and fired shots, police said.
The 47-year-old man suffered a graze wound to the abdomen and was taken to Advocate Trinity Hospital, and the other man was shot in the lower back and taken to Christ Medical Center. Their conditions stabilized, police said.
Just after 6 p.m., a 22-year-old man was standing in the 6000 block of South Halsted when a vehicle approached and someone inside shot him in the arm. The man was taken to Stroger Hospital where his condition was stabilized, police said.
Less than three hours earlier, an 18-year-old man was shot in the West Englewood neighborhood on the South Side.
At 3:30 p.m., the man was outside in the 5500 block of South Elizabeth Street when the suspect or suspects emerged from an alley and fired shots. The man, who is a documented gang member, suffered a gunshot wound to the ankle and was taken to Stroger, where his condition was stabilized.
Earlier that morning, a man was shot during a robbery in the Roseland neighborhood on the Far South Side.
The 28-year-old victim was walking in the 10100 block of South Indiana at 6:20 a.m. when a dark car pulled up with two males inside. The driver was armed with a gun. The passenger got out of the car and rummaged through the man’s pockets, taking his cellphone, wallet and cash, police said.
When the victim tried to run away, the driver opened fire, striking him in the ankle, police said. The car then took off. The victim was taken in good condition to Roseland Community Hospital, police said.
In the day’s first shooting, two men were shot while waiting in the drive-thru lane outside a McDonald’s restaurant in the Southwest Side West Elsdon neighborhood.
The men, ages 26 and 19, were in a vehicle in the drive-thru in the 5200 block of South Pulaski about 1:15 a.m. when a gunman walked up, started shooting and hit both of them, police said. The shooter then left in a dark-colored SUV, and the victims drove to a convenience store parking lot near 59th and Pulaski, where they called police.
The 26-year-old suffered gunshot wounds to the right hand, right shoulder and neck, while the 19-year-old was shot in the right hip, police said. They were both taken to Christ Medical Center, where their conditions were stabilized.
A police source said the 26-year-old is a documented gang member.

Tuesday, November 10, 2015

F**K YOU #OBAMA !!!



Oregon county lets sheriff ignore 'unconstitutional' gun laws, raising legal questions

ore_gun_signs.jpg
In this Oct. 9, 2015, photo, demonstrators wave flags and signs as President Obama's motorcade drives by in Roseburg, Ore. (AP)
An Oregon county has approved a controversial measure giving the local sheriff discretion to ignore gun laws he deems unconstitutional -- potentially putting the sheriff in the middle of a Second Amendment battle and raising legal questions that may have to be resolved in court. 
While overshadowed by high-profile ballot measures elsewhere on marijuana and other issues, residents in Coos County, Ore., overwhelmingly passed the gun rights measure last week with more than 60 percent support. 
The central reason for the initiative was to prevent enforcement of the state's new background check law. Sheriff Craig Zanni already was steering clear of actively enforcing the law, but the ballot measure puts additional pressure on him to defy state and federal gun laws. 
It bars the county from using government resources to enforce any "unconstitutional" laws that infringe on the right to bear arms -- and declares "it shall be the duty" of the sheriff to decide which laws are constitutional and which are not. 
Even Zanni has voiced concerns over what he's legally allowed to do. 
Zanni told The Oregonian he is a strong supporter of gun rights, but predicted before the vote that the matter would end up in court. 
"I'm not sure the courts would agree with that concept," he said. "I would just bet there would be some legal challenges to it." 
At the time, Zanni said he didn't plan to change his approach if the measure passed. One commissioner told the newspaper that passage would put the local government in an "awkward spot." 
When reached by FoxNews.com on Monday, Zanni declined to comment in depth about the next steps. He stressed only that "this was an initiative put together by citizens of this county to address what they felt is a constant attack on their rights." 
The vote came after the mass shooting at Oregon's Umpqua Community College, about 60 miles east of Coos County. 
Ballot initiative sponsor Rob Taylor, a retired optician, told The Daily Signal they're hoping for a court challenge. 
"One of the reasons we enacted this measure is that we wanted to challenge [the state's] background check law through the judicial process," he said. 
While analysts question whether any local jurisdiction can really decide what's constitutional, the measure itself calls for a maximum $2,000 fine for violating it. 
This isn't the first time a county's tried to pass similar ordinances, though the Coos County "Second Amendment Preservation Ordinance" lays out a detailed set of guidelines. 
It prohibits enforcement of measures ranging from registration requirements for legally owned guns to restrictions on semi-automatic weapons. 
But the main target of the measure is the state's new background check law. According to The Oregonian, Zanni to date has said he's not actively looking for violations of that law -- but also has not ruled out the possibility a resident could be prosecuted for breaking it. 
It's unclear whether the new ballot measure might compel the sheriff to rule out that possibility entirely. 
Andrew Kloster, a legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation, told The Daily Signal that a sheriff has to follow state law -- but at the same time, citizens could pursue a lawsuit if a state law requires local officials to violate the Second Amendment. 
FoxNews.com's Ross Powers contributed to this report.

Tuesday, November 03, 2015

#OBAMA, HILLARY TOYING WITH ‘CIVIL WAR’ OVER #GUN CONFISCATION @Daily


O’Malley to roll out 7 proposed anti-gun violence executive actions
WBAL - Baltimore, MD

On November 2, The Daily Beast pointed to recent statements from President Obama and Hillary Clinton regarding the implementation of Australian-style gun confiscation and suggested “civil war could erupt on American soil” if any administration actually tried to confiscate privately owned firearms.

The Daily Beast theoretically agreed that “confiscation on a massive scale” may be “the only way to solve American gun violence,” but they pointed out that it was not realistic and suggested Hillary risks causing irreparable divisions by talking about confiscation then mocking gun owners as conspiracy theorists waiting for “black helicopters” to come take their guns away.
According to The Daily Beast, confiscation was workable in Australia because there was no Second Amendment and the government only had to take 650,000 guns. That is a far cry from the “350 million” believed to be in Americans’ hands.
Yes, “350 million.”
But even more important than the number of guns is the depth of American “devotion” to them. And The Daily Beast observes that it is this devotion–this dedication to the philosophy and tradition underlying the right to keep and bear arms–that turns the mere mention of confiscation into something that could literally rip the country apart.
The Daily Beast put it thus, “The prospect of confiscation—as much as it might, theoretically, reduce drastically or even eliminate gun crime altogether—is simply impossible in the United States.” They pointed to statements by Republican presidential hopeful Ben Carson, who stressed that Jews could have curtailed the Holocaust had they retained their guns. The Daily Beast suggests Carson hit on something “Second Amendment enthusiasts are fond of arguing,” namely, “that gun rights are enshrined in the Constitution not only for the sake of hunters or people who want to protect their homes and businesses from criminals, but also to allow the population to resist an overreaching government.”
Breitbart News previously reported that Founding Father James Madison used Federalist 46 to make that very point–that armed citizens could band together and resist their government, should it tend toward tyranny. And he pointed out that this demonstrated American exceptionalism inasmuch as citizens of other nations, lacking arms, also lacked the ability to resist.
The Daily Beast addressed the way Hillary mentioned confiscation only later to mock gun owners for fearing the government might come after their guns:
Clinton can joke all she likes about Americans fearing “black helicopters” taking their guns away, but it is no exaggeration to suggest that civil war could erupt on American soil were the U.S. government to attempt anything remotely resembling what was done in Australia.
The column in The Daily Beast is aptly titled, “Yes, They Want to Take Your Guns Away.”
Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

Read More Stories About:





Monday, November 02, 2015

Supreme Court’s Decision Could Lead To Second Civil War @Bearing

Posted by  on November 2, 2015 at 7:11 am


The U.S. Supreme Court may decide as early as today whether they will hear a case concerning the obvious unconstitutionality of a Chicago suburb’s ban on semi-automatic firearms. These firearms are clearly protected by the explicit intent of the Second Amendment to protect arms suitable for militia use by the American people.
If the court declines to hear the case and lets these unconstitutional bans stand, they will send the nation on a nearly inevitable path towards another civil war.
The high court is considering whether to accept an appeal filed by Highland Park pediatrician Arie S. Friedman, 49, who claims the ban passed by the City Council in 2013 violates the Second Amendment because it denies him the right to use his semi-automatic weapons to protect his home and family. The new law required that residents such as Friedman, who owned firearms capable of rapidly firing more than 10 rounds of ammunition, either remove them from the city, modify them or turn them over to police.
Friedman, who filed the lawsuit along with the Illinois State Rifle Association, already has lost in two lower courts. A U.S. District Court upheld the ban last year, and the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision. The National Rifle Association has filed a brief to the Supreme Court in support of the suit.
If the Supreme Court takes the case, Illinois would once again land at the center of the contentious legal battle over gun control. It would also raise questions about the legality of similar assault weapons bans in Chicago and other Illinois cities, as well as those in seven states, including New York and California.
Gun rights advocates have argued that rapid-firing, semi-automatic rifles are among the most popular firearms in the country for hunting, recreational shooting and self-defense and are protected under the Supreme Court’s two most recent rulings upholding citizens’ rights to bear arms. During the last seven years, the high court overturned the last remaining firearms bans in the country, in Washington, D.C., and Chicago, ruling that citizens had the right to keep firearms at home for protection.
The explicit intent of the Second Amendment as written by the Founding Fathers was to ensure that the citizenry—whom they refer to as the militia—will always be armed with weapons of contemporary military utility in order to form a counterweight to the corrupting influence of government.
The firearms specifically banned by Highland Park and other municipalities are the semi-automatic carbines and rifles best suited for that original role as imagined by the Founders in a contemporary context.
The Brown Bess was the musket used by both American Patriots and British Redcoats. The AR-15—which was in civilian hands for six years before a selective-fire variant was adopted as the general issue M16 and later the M4—is clearly the “modern musket” “in common use” as the militia arm of choice in the United States, with the American civilian owning between five and ten times as many AR-15s as the U.S. military owns M4s and M16s.
If the Supreme Court fails to take up the case, or takes up the case and decides against Freidman, then they will have set the stage for an inevitable civil war, pitting the nation’s radical anti-gun Democrats who desire to destroy the Second Amendment against the 100-140 million American gun owners who will not comply with laws and court decisions that clearly fly in the face of original intent.
The court’s decision could come as soon as today.
May they chose wisely.

REMINGTON ENTERS POCKET #PISTOL MARKET WITH THE RM380 @Breitbart


On November 2, Remington Arms Company entered the pocket pistol marketplace with the release of the RM380.

As the name suggests, the RM380 is chambered in .380 auto. It is a double action only (DAO) semi-automatic pistol that weighs in about 12.2 ounces unloaded–12.7 ounce with a Crimson Trace laser affixed. The pistol holds six rounds in the magazine and a seventh round in the chamber.
Breitbart News has had an RM380 for about four weeks for the purposes of testing, shooting, and carrying the pistol concealed to get a feel for it. After a few hundred rounds and daily carry almost nonstop since receiving the gun, we found the gun accurate, ultra-reliable, and so light that carrying it in the front pocket of a pair of cargo shorts is comfortable to the point that you do not even notice you are carrying a gun.
The RM380 has no external safety. Instead, the long trigger pull associated with a DAO pistol fills that role. In fact, for people used to shooting guns like those from Glock or the Smith & Wesson M&P line, the trigger pull on the RM380 will feel noticeably long at first. But as you shoot the pistol you soon figure out how far back you can quickly pull the trigger before slowing and completing the action to release the hammer and fire a round.
Remington-2-AWR
Once you are acquainted with the gun to that degree two things happen: 1.You begin to see how strikingly accurate a DAO pocket pistol can be. 2. The long trigger pull actually becomes a reassurance that the RM380 would be a difficult gun for a concealed carry permit holder to accidentally fire.
The RM380 comes with two magazines–one which fits flush and one with a finger extension. Breitbart News shot a variety of rounds through the pistol using both magazines without a single misfire or malfunction. Those rounds included FMJ target ammo, flat nose ammo, and +P self-defense hollow point ammunition. The RM380 ate it all up.
The only aspect of the RM380 that temporarily caught our attention in a negative way was the slide stop–commonly referred to as a slide release on many other handguns. We found the stop difficult to release during the first couple of boxes of ammunition but by the time we had fired approximately 150 rounds through the gun the slide stop would release with the touch of the thumb.
When you consider the RM380’s light weight, stubborn reliability, and striking accuracy, it does not take long to figure out this pocket pistol could open the doors to a whole new world for Remington. We will continue to test our RM380–exposing it extreme conditions and putting as many rounds through it as possible–and will do more reviews to reveal what we learn. As of now, with one month and hundreds of rounds behind us, we can say the RM380 is a great pocket pistol for daily carry.
Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.  

Read More Stories About:

Concealed CARRY Magazine Vol. 1

Trust me, you're going to get a lot out of these downloads, enjoy them!
 
 
 
Oh, and one more thing…
 
Watch your inbox tomorrow…
 
I'm going to be making a HUGE announcement
 
An announcement I know you won't want to miss…
 
I'll give you a hint…
 
Tomorrow's email contains something so EXPLOSIVE, so CONTROVERSIAL, responsibly armed Americans across the country will be chompin' at the bit to see what's inside...
 
That's all for now… ;-)
 
Take care and stay safe,
 

 
Tim Schmidt
President | USCCA