Obama Attorney General Pick: Voter ID Laws Are About Taking Back What Dr. King Won

PATRICK HOWLEY

Political Reporter

• SEE ALL ARTICLES
• SEND EMAIL
• SUBSCRIBE TO RSS
• FOLLOW ON TWITTER
• BIO

  PATRICK HOWLEY

  Patrick Howley is an investigative reporter for The Daily Caller.

President Obama’s Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch said that voter ID laws are meant to reverse Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s accomplishments and promised that DOJ lawsuits against “Deep South” states with voter ID laws will continue.

Lynch was nominated two days after President Obama’s post-midterm election White House meeting with Al Sharpton, who previously revealed that he was working with the White House on choosing Holder’s replacement. Lynch was a U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn and prosecutor on the Abner Louima assault case against New York police officers. Lynch met with Sharpton and the wife of a man allegedly brutalized by police officers, in her Brooklyn office on August 21. (RELATED: Did Al Sharpton Just Pick The Next Attorney General?)

http://goo.gl/9zN08v

TweetMe Please

  

-------------------------------------------

I worked as a Republican Judge here on Chi's North Side in the Nov 4 Mid-Terms. Even in VOTER-FRAUD Famous Chicago we turned three voters away out of a total of 225 for the day.

One was sent to another precinct but two were unable to vote because of ID Problems.  If ID is not required, ANYONE will be able to vote.

That IS NOT RACISM - It's COMMON SENSE!

Looks like BO has another Holder Racist clone we will be forced to deal with for the next two years.

DEMS PUSH FOR HEAVY CENSORSHIP OF INTERNET, DRUDGE, BLOGS

by WARNER TODD HUSTON 25 Oct 2014, 10:05 AM PDT 27POST A COMMENT

As the media prepared to vacate newsrooms for the weekend, Democrats snuck in a last minute proposal that the Federal Elections Commission (FEC) be allowed to heavily regulate political content on internet sites such as Youtube, blogs, and the Drudge Report.

Obama FEC Vice Chairperson Ann M. Ravel announced late on Friday that the FEC was preparing new regulations to give itself control over videos, Internet-based political campaigns, and other content on the web. She insisted that, "A reexamination of the commission’s approach to the internet and other emerging technologies is long overdue."

This snap decision came after the FEC deadlocked 3-3 over whether or not an anti-Obama Internet campaign in Ohio had violated FEC campaign disclosure rules. The videos were placed for free on Youtube and were not paid advertising, but they also did not disclose who made them.

Until now, videos and other political content that is not posted for a fee are unregulated by the FEC. Only paid advertising is regulated under election rules. It is this that the Democrats want to change.

http://goo.gl/0lMsr9

TweetMe Please

------------------------------------------------------------
And VERY VERY DANGEROUS!

This Paralegal has been on line since December of 1982 so has seen a lot on line and lived a lot of OnLine (now Internet) history.

From its inception in 1979 (Ward and Randy's BBS here in Elmhust, IL) OnLine services were primarily the function of the Private Bulletin Board and the large Corporate On Line Services that charged a fee.

This SYSOP ran Publisher Information Serice BBS from 1983-1994.  Though a variety of sofware packages were used, PC Board was decided on as a standard.

In 1995, with the Introduction of Windows 3.0 and faster PC's the Internet was introduced to the Public and was a big hit.  There were many of us who were involved in its ancestores, from FIDONET to METRONET etc but the systems were not connected in REAL TIME, save for the Big On line Players like AOL and Compuserve.

In the early 1990's Islamic Terrorists (HAMAS, HEZBOLAH, etc) became aware of these systems as well and began to use them to recruit and publish their Jihad  materials.  

NO ONE STOPPED THEM and EVERY ONE WHO OBJECTED WAS BRANDED A "RACIST" and KICKED OUT!

I was thrown OUT of EVERY Microsoft Community and Yahoo Group of a Political Nature because I POINTED OUT THE DANGERS OF THE MUSLIM TERROR ON LINE!

The FBI was very interested, however but DID LITTLE - and we saw the results on 09/11/2001!

IFF the Dems are allowed to MUZZLE their Critics at WILL the FIRST ONES TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT WILL BE CAIR, MSA, and other ISLAMIC GROUP THAT ARE ALIGNED WITH DEADLY TERRORISTS!

CAIR is IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOW and OBAMA has given TERROR-PREACHING IMAMS FREEDOM TO PREACH THEIR MUSLIM HATE!

If the Internet is Muzzled, what's next?

FOX NEWS and TALK RADIO are all that will be left.

DO YOU WANT THIS DANGER FOR AMERICA?!?!?

Al Gore made $500 million from jihad terror sponsor Qatar

Robert Spencer Oct 3, 2014 at 7:51am Qatar 33 Comments

Dear Mr. Albert Gore:

This letter is being sent to you on behalf of the Qatar Awareness Campaign Coalition. The purpose is to inform you and the public of the activities of Qatar, the country which owns Al Jazeera America, the network which was established following your sale of CurrentTV to Al Jazeera for $500 million in 2013.

As cited below, in fact, you and your business partner, Mr. Joel Hyatt, engaged in two major transactions with Qatar: first the purchase of Newsworld International in 2004, from which you launched CurrentTV; secondly, the selling back of the station to Qatar to broadcast Al Jazeera America, for the price of $500 million.

We urge to you read the information below, which includes evidence that Qatar is arguably the preeminent sponsor of terror in the world today. It is a benefactor of the genocidal armies of ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram; it is involved in Taliban narcotics trafficking through a relationship with the Pakistani National Logistics Cell; and profits from operating a virtual slave state. Qatar is involved in terror operations fromNigeria to Gaza to Syria to Iraq.

Here is pertinent background on your involvement with the Doha-based network, and their ties to Islamists who promote mass murder of religious and ethnic minorities over the airwaves.

http://jihadwatch.org/

TweetMe Please