Vote Trump 2016 !

Vote Trump 2016 !
Trump 2016
Showing posts with label #1st Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #1st Amendment. Show all posts

Friday, December 18, 2015

#Facebook, #Google and #Twitter agree on HATE speech deal - MUSLIM QURAN NOT INCLUDED !!!

  • 15 December 2015
  •  
  • From the sectionEurope
Heiko MaasImage copyrightAP
Image captionJustice Minister Heiko Maas said the deal was about applying law, not limiting free speech
Facebook, Google and Twitter have agreed a deal with Germany under which they will remove hate speech posted on their websites within 24 hours.
German Justice Minister Heiko Maas said the measures would ensure German law was applied online.
Social media cannot "become a funfair for the far right," he said.
The agreement follows reports of a rise in online racism in Germany as the country manages an influx of up to one million migrants and refugees in 2015.
Mr Maas said complaints about hate speech would be assessed by "specialist teams" at the three companies, who would also make it easier for such posts to be reported.
They would assess complaints using the benchmark of German law "and no longer just the terms of use of each network", he said.

Backlash

"When the limits of free speech are trespassed, when it is about criminal expressions, sedition, incitement to carry out criminal offences that threaten people, such content has to be deleted from the net," Mr Maas said.
"And we agree that as a rule this should be possible within 24 hours."
Germany's official welcome for hundreds of thousands of refugees - mainly from Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan - has triggered a backlash from nationalists, including neo-Nazis.
Mr Maas and other critics have previously accused Facebook of acting immediately to remove nudity from users' pages, while allowing racist and xenophobic comments to remain online.
Facebook has said it relies on its users to report offensive comments that incite hatred.
------------------------------------------------------------------
How about MUSLIME "HATE SPEECH"?
The Quran:
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...
but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until"religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly notreferring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember."  

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.


Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org

From http://thereligionofpeace.com/

So HOW ABOUT THIS "HATE SPEECH"?


Sunday, July 26, 2015

GOD AND GUNS !!! @Views


By Reverend David Whitney
July 26, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

Another tragic shooting took place last week. A 24-year-old Kuwaiti-born, Muhammad Youssef Adbulazeez, opened fire at two military facilities in Chattanooga Thursday, killing four Marines and injuring three others before dying from a gunshot wound. I think it is significant that this occurred on the eve of Eid, the biggest Mohammedan holiday of the year, which is the end of Ramadan. By the way Mohammedans supposedly get extra bonus points with Allah for killing infidels during Ramadan.

Video of the sermon:

How demonstrative of the media’s pro-Mohammedan bias that within milli seconds of the Emanuel A.M.E. Church shooting they label that murderer as a white supremicist and blame the battle flag, but they still can’t figure out what motivates a Mohammedan who murders four Marines in one of these suicidal gun free zones on the eve of the Holiest day in Mohammedanism.

Then, in an astonishing statement to the public, police chief Fred Fletcher said, “I can assure you that all agencies—federal, state and local—are working together with the common goal of keeping everybody in this community, across this city, across this state and across this country safe.” So our own military, which is supposed to be able to keep as all safe from terrorism, can’t even protect themselves on American soil. Why? Because they have been disarmed! 

Wow!

The government refuses to let our troops protect themselves in order to pander to the anti-gun crowd who controls our government. How are we to understand these issues Biblically? Does the fact that Jesus Christ is King of Kings and Lord of Lords have anything to teach us in this matter?

http://www.newswithviews.com/Whitney/david148.htm
by Pastor David Whitney

Friday, July 24, 2015

Sheriff puts ‘In God We Trust’ on ALL patrol vehicles; atheists are outraged!

July 23, 2015 | 


Stone County Sheriff Doug Rader is not well known outside his home state, but that’s all about to change.
The Missouri lawman took to social media this week to announce that he has placed “In God We Trust” stickers on all patrol vehicles — much to the chagrin of the non-believers at Friendly Atheist.
“The worst part is that there probably is no legal recourse here,” the blog laments. “‘In God We Trust’ has become so neutralized in our court system that judges no longer see it as Christian. That’s how good it is to be in the Protestant majority in this country.”
Sheriff Rader — on the right — is seen posing with another officer in a photo posted on a Facebook page set up for the department. Rader notes in a caption that “In God We Trust” became our national motto in 1956.
“There has been no better time than now to proudly display our National Motto!” he states.
And if that weren’t enough, Friendly Atheist pointed out that the Stone County Sheriff’s website includes a variation of the Bible verse, Romans 13:3-4
motto
But it gets even better. The sheriff includes an introductory message on the website where he talks about his “sworn duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.”
A duty that he believes puts him at odds with the White House.


Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/07/23/sheriff-puts-in-god-we-trust-on-all-patrol-vehicles-atheists-are-outraged-228152#ixzz3goo1gyaO


Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/07/23/sheriff-puts-in-god-we-trust-on-all-patrol-vehicles-atheists-are-outraged-228152#ixzz3gonfncU6

Monday, July 20, 2015

Federal Court: MTA violated Geller’s, Spencer’s First Amendment rights ! @JIhadwatchRS

  BY 

killing Jews is worshipAnother victory in the ongoing war against the freedom of speech.
“Federal Court: MTA Violated Pamela Geller’s First Amendment Rights and Must Pay as a Result,”American Freedom Law Center, July 20, 2015:
On Thursday of last week (7/16), the federal court hearing the case against the New York City’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) for illegally refusing to display an anti-jihad advertisement granted the plaintiffs, Pamela Geller, Robert Spencer, and their non-profit organization, American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), partial summary judgment and ordered the MTA to pay nominal damages.  The court’s finding of liability and award of damages also opens the door for Geller and her co-plaintiffs to recover their legal fees and costs from the City’s transit authority.  The controversial anti-jihad ad, referred to in the case as the “Hamas Killing Jews” advertisement, is displayed below.
Anti-Jihad Ad
Judge John G. Koeltl, presiding in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in downtown Manhattan, had earlier ruled on April 20 that the MTA’s refusal to run the ad out of fear that Muslims in New York might understand the ad to be advocating violence and would therefore rise up to murder Jews as Islamic worship, was unconstitutional.  In fact, Judge Koetl ruled that there was no evidence of any threat of violence.  Based on these findings, Judge Koeltl ordered the MTA to display the ad immediately, even before the court’s final judgment.
The court did, however, stay (i.e., postponed) the enforcement of its order for 30 days to give the MTA time to appeal or to work out the logistics of running the ad.  The MTA did neither.  Instead, it convened a public board meeting at which MTA board member Catharles Moerdler ranted incoherently about hate speech and Geller’s newly proposed ads designed to expose wealthy Jews who support the BDS (boycott, divestiture, and sanction) movement against Israel.

http://jihadwatch.org/

Please RT - THANKS!

Monday, July 06, 2015

WHAT CONSTITUTION? #Obama Plans To Muzzle Gun-Related Speech

Posted by  on June 7, 2015 at 11:12 am


The foreign-raised President of the United States—who never set foot on the U.S. mainland until he was an adult—has proven throughout his rogue administration that he has no respect at all for the Constitution. He’s proving it yet again with a dual attack on both the First and Second Amendments, with an attempt to twist ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) regulations to ban online speech about firearms, claiming that information posted online is “exporting” data.
Even as news reports have been highlighting the gun control provisions of the Administration’s “Unified Agenda” of regulatory objectives (see accompanying story), the Obama State Department has been quietly moving ahead with a proposal that could censor online speech related to firearms. This latest regulatory assault, published in the June 3 issue of the Federal Register, is as much an affront to the First Amendment as it is to the Second. Your action is urgently needed to ensure that online blogs, videos, and web forums devoted to the technical aspects of firearms and ammunition do not become subject to prior review by State Department bureaucrats before they can be published…
…With the new proposal published on June 3, the State Department claims to be “clarifying” the rules concerning “technical data” posted online or otherwise “released” into the “public domain.” To the contrary, however, the proposal would institute a massive new prior restraint on free speech. This is because all such releases would require the “authorization” of the government before they occurred. The cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining such authorizations, moreover, would make online communication about certain technical aspects of firearms and ammunition essentially impossible.
Penalties for violations are severe and for each violation could include up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $1 million. Civil penalties can also be assessed. Each unauthorized “export,” including to subsequent countries or foreign nationals, is also treated as a separate violation.
Gunsmiths, manufacturers, reloaders, and do-it-yourselfers could all find themselves muzzled under the rule and unable to distribute or obtain the information they rely on to conduct these activities. Prior restraints of the sort contemplated by this regulation are among the most disfavored regulations of speech under First Amendment case law.

http://goo.gl/gZRY7I

Please RT - THANKS! 

Tuesday, June 02, 2015

#CCOT #Conservative Party Supports #PamelaGeller Stand in Defense of Free Speech

While the Democrats (the party of treason), and many RINOs in the GOP, are working to criminalize free speech, the Conservative Party has taken a very principled stand in defense of the First Amendment.  They speak for the American people who have been silenced and abandoned by the GOP, the media — the elites.

Here is their press release.
Screen Shot 2015-06-01 at 1.31.35 PM
“The Conservative Party Supports Free Speech, Offensive to Muslims or Not,” The Conservative Party, June 1, 2015
Last month two Islamic terrorists attempted to assassinate three of the world’s best known critics of violent Islam: Geert Wilders of the Netherlands and Americans Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller. It was the first attack by ISIS in the country.
...
     
 

Letter from a Kenyan former Muslim


I received this informative and harrowing letter from a former Muslim in Kenya. If only the Obama policymakers who are helping bring jihad and sharia to Kenya would take heed. I do not endorse all his views of Christianity and about what to do regarding Islam, but his insight into the Muslim mindset and what is taught in the mosques and madrasas is revealing.
Photo above: Westgate jihad massacre
I am a former Muslim and I feel Kenyans are very naive, that even in this day and age, Christians know nothing about Muslims or their religion. We buy what politicians say, be they Christians or Muslims, that Islam is a religion of peace and no religion asks its people to kill. All that is propaganda. The bad thing is that we have no...

Thursday, May 28, 2015

#CCOT #Moderate Dubai court jails man for insulting #ISLAM on #FACEBOOK ! @JihadwatchRS

  BY 

behead-those-who-insult-islam-1They must be moderates, for if they were “extremists,” they would have sentenced him to beheading. In any case, this same “moderation” is coming to the U.S., as authorities of all sorts counsel submission to those who proclaim that they will kill us for what they perceive as insults to Islam. Those authorities mask their submission as “respect” and “prudence,” but it is really just fear and cowardice.
“Man jailed by Dubai court for insulting Islam on Facebook,” by Thaer Zriqat, The National, May 28, 2015:
DUBAI // A man who insulted Islam on Facebook after watching disturbing video footage from Iraq has been jailed for one year by the Dubai Criminal Court.
Prosecutors said that on July 6 last year, 41-year-old Indian SG insulted Islam and the Prophet Mohammed in a post on the social media site.
SG was reported to police by salesman SF after he received a WhatsApp message with a screen shot of the post.
“Once I saw the message, I reported it to police,” said SF, 24.
During interrogations, SG confessed to posting insults after watching the footage. No details were given on the content of the video.
Reports shown in court noted that SG’s mobile phone had the Facebook app which was logged into the same account where the insulting messages were posted.
SG was sentenced to a year in jail followed by deportation.

http://jihadwatch.org/

Please RT - THANKS!

#PJNET #JPNET #Geller “If We Surrender Now, #FreeSpeech Is A Relic of History” ! @Atlas



Check out the interview I did with Dom Giordano on CBS radio:
“American Freedom Defense Initiative Pres. On Muhammad Cartoons: If We Surrender Now, Freedom Of Speech Is A Relic,”  CBS Philadelphia, May 27, 2015
PHILADELPHIA (CBS) — Pamela Geller, President of American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), spoke with Talk Radio 1210 WPHT midday host Dom Giordano about her organization’s new campaign to have cartoon depictions of the Prophet Muhammad on buses in Washington, D.C.
Geller says those who have fears about violence from outraged extremists who feel Muhammad should not be depicted should realize that these are very recent tactics, and that Muhammad has been drawn for the past 1,400 years without issue.
...

Monday, May 25, 2015

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS: TYRANNY OF THE MIND #CCOT #PJNET #TCOT @Views

By Chuck Baldwin
May 21, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

In a letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush, dated September 23, 1800, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.” By any definition that Jefferson could have envisioned, today’s political correctness can only be regarded as “tyranny over the mind of man.” Forget freedom of association, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, or freedom of privacy, political correctness demands that we don’t even have freedom of thought or opinion.

If one does not have the freedom to live in good conscience with his own sense of morality, he or she is indeed the most enslaved of creatures. Listen to Jefferson again, “To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

Forcing men to pay taxes “for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors” is indeed sinful and tyrannical enough. But to compel a man to actively PARTICIPATE in ideas he disbelieves and abhors is even more so. And, that, my friends, is exactly what modern political correctness forces us to do--or at least tries to force us to do. Political correctness attempts to strip us of our own sense of right and wrong. It is not only tyranny of conduct and behavior; it is tyranny of the mind and heart.

http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin857.htm
by Pastor Chuck Baldwin


Monday, May 04, 2015

#FCC Commissioner: Feds May Come for #Drudge !!! @WND

By Rudy Takala | May 4, 2015 | 1:18 PM EDT

CNSNews.com) – Federal Communications Commission (FCC) member Ajit Pai said over the weekend that he foresees a future in which federal regulators will seek to regulate websites based on political content, using the power of the FCC or Federal Elections Commission (FEC). He also revealed that his opposition to “net neutrality” regulations had resulted in personal harassment and threats to his family.
Speaking on a panel at the annual “Right Online” conference in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, Pai told audience members, “I can tell you it has not been an easy couple of months personally. My address has been publicly released. My wife’s name, my kids’ names, my kids’ birthdays, my phone number, all kinds of threats [have come] online.”

‘This is a war': #FREESPEECH lovers rally with ‘I am Pamela Geller’ after #garlandshooting !!!

Only when it comes to Islamic terror do liberals try to blame the victims. But conservatives weren’t letting them get away with it on Monday.
In the aftermath of the attack on the Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest in Garland, Texas, that left one guard wounded and two terrorists dead, social media has been on fire with arguments over where the blame should be placed.
Naturally, in an era of bootlickers for Islamist terrorists, there was no shortage of those trying to lay responsibility for the attacks at the feet of the victims, including a hit piece from British tabloid “The Daily Mail” attacking controversial event organizer Pamela Geller.
”New York Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi also asked, “Free speech aside, why would anyone do something as provocative as hosting a ‘Muhammad drawing contest?’”

Astounding that a journalist would ever start a sentence by putting free speech aside.


Read more: http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/05/04/this-is-a-war-free-speech-lovers-rally-with-i-am-pamela-geller-after-shooting-201351#ixzz3ZBX5Lit9

Saturday, May 02, 2015

MTA: We have a right to ban #free #speech, Judge says not so fast !

Screen Shot 2015-05-02 at 4.03.50 PM

We had a victory yesterday in federal court. The MTA filed a motion to dismiss yesterday. The Judge who ruled in our favor was not amused. And just to show just loaded the dice are against us, the judge, the MTA lawyer and libeler Charles Moerdler, the MTA board member who prefaced his remarks with a vicious tirade of abuse against me during the vote ban, are all friends. Good clubby, cigar, 1%,  brandy friends. But the Judge assured us he would be impartial and frankly to date he has been so I will reserve judgement.
Yesterday, the MTA and AFDI lawyer David Yerushalmi argued before Manhattan federal Judge John Koeltl who ruled in our favor. not  a week ago.  MTA lawyer Peter Sistrom insisted yesterday that the ban against our ads was not against us per se but political ads.  Nonsense. They never fought the anti-Jewish ads or anti-Israel ads, they only banned only our ads – ads exposing the ideology behind the jihad against Israel and America.
There is an expression in yiddish, “auf ein gunaf brentz hittle ” or “on the thief the hat burns.” In other words, “you have a guilty conscience”. And the hot hats over at the MTA are on fire.
Judge Koeltl railed against Sistrom for 45 minutes. It was gorgeous.
- See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2015/05/mta-we-have-a-right-to-ban-free-speech.html/#sthash.JlCQ1XC7.dpuf