#OBAMA PLAN TO IMPORT 10,000 REFUGEES WILL COST TAXPAYERS $6.5 BILLION !!!

REPORT: 

Reuters/Alkis Konstantinidis

by JULIA HAHN11 Sep 2015Washington D.C.1,436

President Obama’s plan to import 10,000 Syrian refugees would cost U.S. tax payers $130 million per year, according to projections from Heritage Foundation scholar Robert Rector.

Extended out over the next 50 years, these additional 10,000 migrants would cost U.S. taxpayers $6.5 billion over the course of the migrants’ lifetime.

On Sept. 10, a White House spokesman said President Barack Obama would grant residence to 10,000 additional Syrians in 2016, along with the routine inflow of 70,000 refugees and 1 million new immigrants. Many establishment Republican presidential candidates such as 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL)

80%

, Jeb Bush, and

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)

47%

, say it’s the United States’ duty to import these economic migrants from predominantly poor and Muslim countries.

Because refugees, by law, are required to apply for lawful permanent resident (LPR) status one year after entering the United States, they fairly soon become eligible for all federal benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers. Moreover, if they have U.S.-born children then those children are immediately eligible for services.

A low-skilled legal immigrant generally receives $4 of benefits for every $1 of taxes they contribute– this would apply to low-skilled refugees over time as well. Rector notes that we do not know the specific education status of each individual refugee. However, assuming that they are predominantly low-skilled, each migrant would cost U.S. taxpayers $13,000 per year. The importation of 10,000 migrants, therefore, would result in a net cost (total benefits received minus total taxes paid) of $130 million per year.

This $6.5 billion expenditure to provide community services, education, health, welfare and retirement costs to 10,000 migrants comes in addition to the approximately $13.5 billion in foreign aid to Middle Eastern nations that United States taxpayers sent in 2013.

GOP frontrunner Donald Trump has said that the United States’ immigration policy needs to prioritize the national interests of its citizenry. “Look, from a humanitarian standpoint, I’d love to help. But we have our own problems. We have so many problems that we have to solve,” Trump declared on Wednesday night’s broadcast of Hannity.

Trump explained that Muslim countries should be willing to take in some of the Muslim migrants: “The Gulf states [are] tremendously wealthy. You have five groups of people, six groups, they’re not taking anybody. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, these are tremendously wealthy and powerful from the standpoint of money. They — they’re not taking anybody. Russia’s not taking. Nobody’s taking. [But we’re] supposed to take — we have to straighten out our own problems,” Trump said.

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has articulated a similar position. “No, we shouldn’t be taking on any more Syrian refugees right now,” Walker told reporters on Wednesday in Eau Claire, Wisconsin.

By contrast, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and Lindsey Graham– all of whom support expanding record high immigration rates– have announced their willingness to accept migrants.

“I would be open to that if it can be done in a way that allows us to ensure that among them are not people who are part of a terrorist organization who are using this crisis,” Rubio told Boston Herald Radio on September 8th. This proposal could result in the admittance of many refugees. “The vast and overwhelming majority of people who are seeking refuge are not terrorists, of course, but you always are concerned about that,” Rubio said.

Read More Stories About:

Big Government, 2016 Presidential Race

NIGGAH RAPES WHITE WOMAN, STABS HER 16 TIMES – NO NATIONAL TV

• 2.94k
  
• 15
  
• 1
  

Obama has promised many things, with the theme “Transforming America”.  In 2008, many asked “transforming America into what?”  Now, 7 years later, the transformation is near complete.  Racial tensions, some say building up into an out and out race war.  Economically “spreading the wealth around”–which brings us to this story.

The neighboorhood, Willowbrook, is a suburb of Chicago.  The woman, parking her car in her garage, was approached by a black man asking for money.  She declined and closed her garage.  He ends up on the porch, knocks on the door and again, asks for money—she attempts to close the door, he forces his way in.  

He rapes and 

stabs her over 17 

times.  

No outrage in the media.  No nation wide story.

This actually is just another crime on just another day of 400 million people living in the same country. But, the media would have you believe that something more is amiss…that the white on black…or cops on black crime has run rampant…nothing could be further from the truth…

The Obama administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, drawing fire from critics who decry the proposal as executive overreach in search of an “unrealistic utopia.”

A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country.

The regulations would use grant money as an incentive for communities to build affordable housing in more affluent areas while also taking steps to upgrade poorer areas with better schools, parks, libraries, grocery stores and transportation routes as part of a gentrification of those communities.

“HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds .”

This plan is akin to the Johnson Administration’s “Great Society” legislation.  Suburbia towns, like Compton, California, were targeted.  Built next to middle class neighborhoods were communities of apartments.  These communities were HUD programs and designated for individuals who qualified for low income housing.  Today, those communities still exist, they are called “the projects” in Los Angeles.  The town of Compton, once a safe and family friendly city in the 1940-50’s turned into one of the most infamous places on the west coast.  In fact, this summer a movie called “Straight Outta Compton” premiered.  The movie, which highlights the 1990’s rap group “NWA” (Niggers Witt Attitudes) pushes the agenda of a race war, and encouraging hatred toward the police with a song called “F*@K The Police”.

Obama’s agenda is nothing new.  This agenda of pitting white vs. black, the police vs minorities has its roots back in the 1960’s.  There are those Black leaders like Star Parker who experienced the welfare/HUD housing maze that left her broken.  Star tells the story of what happened in the 1960’s and how it destroyed the Black family.  Point is: these programs enslave minorities into a “system” they can never leave.

Suspect:

http://goo.gl/R48fPg

Please RT - THANKS

Half of Immigrant Households on WELFARE !!! @NewsMax

Immigrants from Central America being picked up in Texas in 2014. (John Moore/Getty Images)

By Cathy Burke   |   Wednesday, 02 Sep 2015 03:49 PM\

Half of immigrant households, both legal and illegal, received some kind of public assistance in 2012, compared with 30 percent of non-immigrant families enrolled in welfare programs, a new report shows.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies' 52-page study, which examined the Census Bureaus' Survey of Income and Program Participation data, welfare use rates are "a good deal higher than use rates shown by other Census data."

Editor's Note: Do You Support Obama's Plans for Stricter Gun Control? Vote Now.

The study considered welfare as including Medicaid and cash, food and housing programs.

Among the report findings were that:

• In 2012, 51 percent of households headed by an immigrant (legal or illegal) reported that they used at least one welfare program during the year, compared to 30 percent of non-immigrant households.

• Welfare use is high for both new arrivals and well-established immigrants. Of households headed by immigrants who have been in the country for more than two decades, 48 percent access welfare.

• No single program explains immigrants' higher overall welfare use. For example, not counting subsidized school lunch, welfare use is still 46 percent for immigrants and 28 percent for non-immigrants. Not counting Medicaid, welfare use is 44 percent for immigrants and 26 percent for non-immigrants.

• Eighty-seven percent of immigrant households had at least one worker in 2012, higher than the 76 percent rate for non-immigrant households.

• Use of welfare by immigrant households compared with non-immigrant households in four "top immigrant receiving states" were California, at 55 percent compared with 30 percent; New York, with 59 percent versus 33 percent; Texas at 57 percent versus 34 percent; and Florida with 42 percent versus 28 percent.

Latest News Update

Get Newsmax TV At Home »

Special: New Probiotic Fat Burner Takes GNC by Storm

"The findings of this analysis have important policy implications," the study's executive summary concluded.

Editor's Note: Did Hillary Clinton Break the Law? Vote Here Now.

"Perhaps most important, the significantly higher welfare use associated with immigrants means that it is very likely immigration is a drain on public coffers, exacerbating the nation's fiscal deficit."

Related Stories:

• What Effects Will Raising Minimum Wage Have on Illegal Immigration?
• Illegal Immigration: The Cost to Build Wall on US-Mexico Border

© 2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Low Life THUG stabs Woman 17 times, sexually assaults her inside home @WGN

WILLOWBROOK, Ill. — A search continues for the man who brutally attacked a woman in her home in Willowbrook over the weekend.

A car was found parked on a street in Brookfield overnight and it matches the description of the attacker’s car.

Detectives checked it out early this morning before it was towed away, but police are not confirming it is the car.

On Sunday, police released a sketch of the man they say stabbed and sexually assaulted the 26-year-old woman Saturday afternoon.

Police say he pulled up into the woman’s driveway and asked her for money. She refused and went inside the home.  He got out and asked to use the phone; she said no through a window. Then he forced his way into the home and stabbed her 17 times, including her face, liver and kidney. He also beat her, breaking six bones in her face, and sexually assaulted her.

She remains in intensive care.

The suspect, who police say is ‘very dangerous,’ is described as an African-American man in his 30s, skinny, around 5 feet 10 inches and 160-180 lbs. His hair was pulled or combed back and had dread-like curls. He was wearing khaki shorts and a blue shirt.

The suspect was seen driving a dark blue Nissan Altima with an Indiana license plate and tinted windows.

VIDEO

Walls WORK - ask #ISRAEL !!!

West Bank Security Fence:
Background & Overview

by Mitchell Bard
(Updated April 2015)

---

Security Fence: Table of Contents | Fence Route Map | Supreme Court Ruling

---

From September 2000 to mid-2005, hundreds of Palestinian suicide bombings and terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians killed more nearly 1,000 innocent people and wounded thousands of others. In response, Israel's government decided to construct asecurity fence that would run near the “Green Line”between Israel and the West Bank to preventPalestinian terrorists from easily infiltrating into Israel proper. The project had the overwhelming support of the Israeli public and was deemed legal by Israel's Supreme Court.

Israel's fence garnered international condemnation, but the outrage is a clear double standard - there is nothing new about the construction of a security fence. Many nations have fences to protect their borders - the United States, for example, has one to prevent illegal immigration. In fact, when the West Bank fence was approved, Israel had already built a fence surrounding the Gaza Strip that had worked - not a single suicide bomber has managed to cross Israel's border with Gaza.

- Israel is Forced to Act
- Making Terrorism More Difficult
- Other Benefits
- Planning the Fence Route
- High Tech Fence
- Politics
- Precedents
- Inconvenience vs Saving Lives

Israel is Forced to Act

The Palestinians committed themselves in theOslo accords and in the road map to dismantle terrorist networks and confiscate illegal weapons. After more than 10 years of negotiations, and a mounting toll of Israeli civilian casualties, however, it became clear to the Israeli people that the Palestinian Authority (PA) made a strategic choice to use terror to achieve its aims and that something had to be done to protect the civilian population.

“It obliges us to establish a barrier wall which is the only thing that can minimize the infiltration of these male and female suicide bombers,” said Defense Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer, who has emphasized that “the fence is not political, [and] is not a border.”

Some Israelis oppose the fence either because they fear it will constitute a recognition of the 1949 armistice line as a final border. Jews living in the West Bank, beyond the planned route of the fence, in particular, argue that they are now being left relatively unprotected and worry that they might be forced to relocate behind the fence if it does become a political border in the future.

Making Terrorism More Difficult

Before the construction of the fence, and in many places where it has not yet been completed, a terrorist need only walk across an invisible line to cross from the West Bank into Israel. No barriers of any kind exist, so it is easy to see how a barrier, no matter how imperfect, won't at least make the terrorists' job more difficult. Approximately 75 percent ofthe suicide bombers who attacked targets inside Israel came from across the border where the first phase of the fence was built.

This diagram shows why a wall is being built in a few specific places where Palestinian snipers have terrorized motorists.

During the 34 months from the beginning of the violence in September 2000 until the construction of the first continuous segment of the security fence at the end of July 2003, Samaria-based terrorists carried out 73 attacks in which 293 Israelis were killed and 1950 wounded. In the 11 months between the erection of the first segment at the beginning of August 2003 and the end of June 2004, only three attacks were successful, and all three occurred in the first half of 2003.

Since construction of the fence began, the number of attacks has declined by more than 90%. The number of Israelis murdered and wounded has decreased by more than 70% and 85%, respectively, after erection of the fence.

Even the Palestinian terrorists have addmitted the fence is a deterrent. On November 11, 2006,Islamic Jihad leader Abdallah Ramadan Shalah said on Al-Manar TV the terrorist organizations had every intention of continuing suicide bombingattacks, but that their timing and the possibility of implementing them from the West Bankdepended on other factors. “For example,” he said, “there is the separation fence, which is an obstacle to the resistance, and if it were not there the situation would be entirely different.”

The value of the fence in saving lives is evident from the data: In 2002, the year before construction started, 457 Israelis were murdered; in 2009, 8 Israelis were killed.

In order to thwart possible Hezbollah infiltrations through the border with Lebanon, in April 2015 it was announced that the IDF had begun construction of a 7-mile long land berm (earth barrier) on the Northern border. The IDF is “executing a significant engineering endeavor, creating obstacles in the terrain so as to use if for our defense” by constructing the border, according to IDF Colonel Alon Mendes. The barrier is expected to be expanded in the future.

Other Benefits

The Green Line is crossed by numerous dirt roads and it is impossible to patrol it. Many Palestinians take advantage of these roads to come to work illegally in Israel or to get between parts of the Palestinian administered territories to avoid checkpoints. Some also cross to carry out terror operations and theft. Since 1994, Palestinians, sometimes in cooperation with Israeli middlemen, have stolen thousands of automobiles as well as farm machinery and animals.¹

Israelis living along the Green Line, both Jews and Arabs, favor the fence to prevent infiltration by suicide bombers and by thieves and vandals. In fact, the fence has caused a revolution in the daily life of some Israeli Arab towns because it has brought quiet, which has allowed a significant upsurge in economic activity.

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Peace/fence.html

#BlackLivesMatter AND THE NEW RACISM !

By Attorney Jonathan Emord

Author of "The Rise of Tyranny" and
"Global Censorship of Health Information" and
"Restore The Republic"

August 17, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

Martin Luther King’s dream for America was one of unity among all people regardless of race, a place of no bigotry, a place of no racial strife, a place where a person would be judged not by the color of his or her skin but by the content of his or her character. He believed in the promise of the Declaration of Independence and called upon America to allow that promise to reach its black citizens equally with its white citizens. 

His dream was one not of exclusion, separatism and hate but of inclusion, unity and love. He said, “I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.” He wanted children regardless of race to be sisters and brothers, all Americans. He disavowed the politics of segregation, racism, and racial violence.

For that reason, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were ideological opposites. During his Nation of Islam phase, Malcolm X called for the overthrow of “white people” whom he referred to as “devils.” Malcolm X argued that “blacks are superior to whites” and that blacks would eventually take-over the world. Malcolm X called Martin Luther King Jr. a stooge for the white establishment and referred to King’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech as a “farce.” Malcolm X believed the black and white races could never integrate and should never integrate because of black supremacy.

The #BlackLivesMatter movement more readily subscribes to the views of Malcolm X than it does the legacy of Martin Luther King. Like Malcolm X, the Black Lives Matter movement does not embrace the Declaration of Independence and the promise of equal justice under law and racial harmony for all. Instead the movement denounces the United States and all American institutions and advocates racial strife as a means to promote the interests of blacks at the expense of law and order.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan409.htm
by Attorney Jonathan Emord

VIDEO Farrakhan Shouts "Whites DESERVE TO DIE - ALLAHU AKBAR !!!"

by Gregory Tomlin | 14 August, 2015

• t
• Archives
• Finding God
• VideFarrakhan shouts 'Allah Akbar,' says white people know they 'deserve to die'by Gregory Tomlin | 14 August, 2015"I wouldn't bring our young 

That's what the white man hopes for. 

That's why he makes mischief 

with my words. 'Farrakhan wanna 

get an army to kill people,' because, 

you see, 

White people 

deserve to die. 

“God is with you. That's why we say, 'Allah Akbar.' God is great. We have no weapon. We bother nobody. Then if you come to take our life, don't be surprised if you lose your own.”

- Louis Farrakhan

#BlackLivesMatter - see ? Fatal crash, shooting cause major problems on Eisenhower !

POSTED 3:05 PM, JULY 31, 2015, BY DANA REBIK,

CHICAGO– It was a busy morning for Illinois State Police– and a miserable commute on the Eisenhower.

Around 4:30 a.m. Friday, there was a single vehicle rollover accident in the westbound lanes near Laramie. Capt. David Byrd, Illinois State Police said there “were six occupants in that vehicle. There was an ejection and one female subject lost her life in the crash.”

Then around 8:00 a.m. during the height of the morning rush hour, a shooting took place on the eastbound lanes between Austin and Central. Capt. Byrd said “there were so many cars in that area there could have been multiple shooting victims.”

Police say shots were fired from a blue jeep with tinted windows, hitting a grey minivan.

The driver, shot several times, pulled off 290– ending up in this alley on West Maypole at a friend’s house. There were visible drops of blood on the front stoop of the home— where an ambulance picked him up.

http://wgntv.com/2015/07/31/fatal-crash-shooting-cause-major-problems-on-eisenhower/